Single-payer health care will level the playing field

U.S. automakers are struggling – but not because worker wages are too high. A comparison of basic wages and cost-of-living adjustments for U.S. autoworkers shows they’re only about 10% more per hour than their Japanese counterparts ($29 vs. $26 per hour). But the total average hourly cost to U.S. and Japanese employers is $71 and $49 per hour, respectively – a $21 per hour difference.

So what gives?

The reason U.S. workers cost automakers (and other employers) more is simple: the companies are on the hook for costs that their foreign counterparts don’t have to cover.

An estimate from the New York Times shows Japanese automakers effectively pay an average of $49 per hour for each employee; in the U.S., it’s about $71. The difference: health care and pension payments to retirees. In countries with universal health care and strong pension plans (like Japan), businesses have much lower costs, and correspondingly higher profit margins.

If the U.S. had single-payer health care system, General Motors could have saved $22 billion in profits over the past decade – roughly 48% of their total health care expenditures. That’s $9 billion more than the proposed (and now failed) bailout for all three automakers. Just imagine how much a such a plan could save Ford, Chrysler, and thousands of other U.S. corporations and small businesses.

Universal health care is the best way to help return our auto giants to profitability, and rebuild our economy with a prosperous and growing middle-class.

Tagged with: , , ,
Posted in A Fair Deal at Work, Health Care

Comments

  1. James Hovland says:

    So then what you’re saying is, that if we cut the major waste out of our health care system, our companies who have been basically forced to spend this money would be more profitable and possibly not need bailed out?

    What other benefits might we expect from a new system that doesn’t waste 30% of out Health Care dollars on multi million dollar CEO salaries, lobbyists, political contributions, and anti-government propaganda?

    Could ‘Single Payer Health Care’ actually be a highly efficient, quality system that is simply being oppressed and attacked by the capitalist middleman who benefit from the gross waste of our heath care dollars?

    Let me get this straight, if we had ‘Single Payer Health Care’ we could have better care for less, be healthier, have more money to spend, and our businesses would do better too?

    I understand why the insurance industry is against this, but why isn’t everyone else behind it?

    James Hovland, a product of freedom

Leave a Reply

Search the blog

Subscribe to the blog

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Like what you’re reading?
Reader support helps preserve our independent voice for the middle class - please chip in to help out!