George W. Bush won plaudits during the recent election campaign for “starting a conversation” on Social Security. Unfortunately, the discussion thus far has been long on misleading rhetoric and short on hard facts. Bush suggests radically changing Social Security, transforming it from a social insurance program into an investment scheme. Under his proposal, a portion of workers’ contributions would be diverted out of the Social Security system and into individual investment accounts. Bush suggests that such a seismic shift in policy is called for because the current system is hurtling toward insolvency. Moreover, he asserts that under a partially privatized system workers would receive higher benefits. These statements are simply wrong:
- Social Security finances are sound. The “crisis” had been invented.
- Bush and other proponents of privatization greatly understate the costs of their proposed new system.
- Not only will many workers across the spectrum face a severe loss of income under Bush’s radically transformed system, but the disabled, lower-income earners, and most women will face the most severe cuts.
More To Read
March 20, 2024
I-2111: The Income Tax Ban Is A Spectacle, but One We Can’t Ignore
A way to waste time, energy, and money, I-2111 is costing more than just taxes
March 20, 2024
Let’s Go Washington: Three initiatives threatening to roll back years of progress
Here’s what you need to know about the initiatives on your November ballot
March 12, 2024
Washington’s Women Are More Protected This Equal Pay Day
Thanks to an update to the state's wage discrimination protections, Washington woman are closer to closing the wage gap